Week 5 Prompt
Booklist
will not publish negative reviews, while, as you have all seen, Kirkus has no
problems with it (check out this savage review -
https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/sebastia-alzamora/blood-crime/). EBook
only books, which are increasingly popular (especially in the romance genre)
see little to no reviews in professional publications unless they have a big
name author, and then still it's usually only RT Reviews (formally Romantic
Times) or other genre heavy publications. How does this affect collection
development?
In our library, we
offer Overdrive and Hoopla access for our patrons. We are seeing an increase in our eBook
circulation especially with the Romance genre.
Personally, it seems people are more likely to read some hot romance
novels that can be checked out in the privacy of their own homes rather than do
the “perceived walk of shame” to the front desk with a handful of steamy
romance novels. None of us care what a
person reads, but from watching people slink around and shoot a lot of furtive
glances to make sure no one is looking, I can tell the patron cares. I get patrons who peek around the stacks, do
a few “psstt…. pssttt….” to get my attention, and then wave me over with
frantic hands. I get to them, and I get
a whisper, “Where can I find the Fifty shades books?” I try to soothe them by telling them I have
read the books, many times, and I can find the books and take them to the front
desk for them. After the very visible
sigh of relief, the patron walks confidently out from behind the safety of the
see through stacks to the front desk.
So, the bigger the
selection of romance novels I can provide for my patrons, even just eBook
options, the better. I struggle with
book reviews because they are all really just subjective.
To get to the answer of
collection development, I feel it is important to look outside of the big name
releases. Of course we are going to
order all of the big names anyway, nearly every library does. If the person who orders the books does not
take the time to branch out, collection development suffers. I think using options like NoveList that will
give author, book, or series read alikes would really help the person to branch
out and discover options the patron does not know exists. I tend to lean towards finding the positive
in books so I would look around on Goodreads and see what people are
enjoying. Most books are not going to be
critical darlings so entertaining the reader is my primary goal! I think collection development success rests
on the shoulders of the person ordering.
Know your demographic, see what categories resonate with them, and then
see what options are out there besides the “big names”.
I
have posted two more documents in the week five files. One is two reviews of an
eBook only romantic suspense novel, one from a blog and one from amazon. Look
over the reviews - do you feel they are both reliable? How likely would you be
to buy this book for your library?
I would buy this eBook
for my library based on the title alone.
After the success of Fifty Shades (I am bringing that up…again!) I have
learned that patrons clamor for the “rich guy finding love with a normal girl”
type of story. With this one, it is a
clean version with the same premise so it will appeal to patrons who enjoy that
type of story without the extremes of Fifty Shades.
To address the reviews,
I tend to appreciate any person that takes the time to review a book, even if
their grammar or approach is not the best.
These are not professionals; these are every day folks who took the time
to share their thoughts. Luckily in our
library, since we are smaller, we do not have to contend with choices being
questioned at every turn. We have to
spend a certain percentage of the budget on books (whether eBooks or physical)
and if we are purchasing items that fit into our demographic interests, then we
are successful in meeting their needs.
The book does feel like
a Hallmark channel movie so again, that alone tells me patrons would read the
book. Hallmark makes a killing with
those movies so they are on to something.
Our paperbacks fly out the door so an eBook version in the same vein
will be well received. (Interesting fact
with my library…our Director REFUSES to purchase romance paperbacks, even
though it is extremely popular with our patrons. Instead, we rely on donations and Evergreen
interlibrary loans!)
The
other document contains some reviews of Angela's Ashes, by Frank McCourt, an
incredibly popular memoir. These reviews are all from professional
publications, feel free to find more on your own I just nabbed a few from the
Book Review Digest database for you. How do these reviews make you feel about
the possibility of adding Angela's Ashes to your collection?
The professional
reviews were excellent and based on those alone; I would add the book to the
collection. In addition to the “strictly
entertaining books” there is a need and a want for more critically acclaimed
novels as well. There are all types of
readers so it is important to have something for everyone. I do appreciate with our Evergreen,
Overdrive, and Hoopla, we are able to find something even if we do not have a
physical copy in our building. Also, if
a movie is made from a book such as Angela’s
Ashes, when the movie is released there is a renewed interest in the
book. I think it is important to be
aware of when books to movies are being released to make sure we have at least
one copy of the book for patrons to read.
I went to Amazon to see
what the “everyday folk” thought of the book. 86% of the 2109 reviews were
rated 4 stars or higher; so this book also appeals to the everyday people. Only 5% gave it 1 star so I was curious as to
why. It seemed to boil down to two
issues; the copy of the book they ordered had a defect (such as someone’s snack
left stuck to it) and/or they found it depressing. From reading the description, it was pretty
obvious it was going to be depressing so that should not have been a surprise;
but again, not all books appeal to everyone.
Do
you think it's fair that one type of book is reviewed to death and other types
of books get little to no coverage? How does this affect a library's
collection?
It really is not fair
but all big name authors started out the same way; struggling to get noticed by
“the right people”. Also, some
publicists do better than others. So,
for the rest of the crowd, it is claw and scratch to get the book information out
there. There are a lot of avenues to
take such as Amazon, appealing to blog writers, Goodreads, paying for Kirkus,
and Facebook to get the book information in front of the librarians’ eyes. The author has to do a lot of self-marketing
in order to be noticed. If the title is
never seen, it will be nearly impossible to be included in a library’s
collection.
And
how do you feel about review sources that won't print negative content? Do you
think that's appropriate?
It really depends on
what type of book you are looking for.
I tend to try and find reasons to purchase or read a book so I would be
more interested in the positives. Where
I would be more interested in negative reviews would be controversial non-fiction
new releases. I would want to know what
critical reviewers thought and how the public might perceive it. I don’t think any book should be excluded
based on content. I would still purchase
the titles; I just want to be prepared for any questions that might come up.
It is also important
for the content of a book to be appropriate for your demographic. (Urban planning would not be useful in a southern
Indiana rural farming community; that is what I mean by being appropriate.) Fluffier titles are not very likely to get critical
positive reviews but if that are what patrons read, then there is a need to
find reviewing resources that target that genre specifically. I really appreciate this class for teaching
me about the review sites that do exist for specific genres!
If
you buy for your library, how often do you use reviews to make your decisions?
If not, how do you feel about reviews for personal reading, and what are some
of your favorite review sources?
At this time, I do not
purchase books for circulation but I have purchased books for the summer
reading program. There was not much reviewing there since the books were
prizes. I am picky about reviews when it
comes to my own reading. It really irks
me when there is so much detail included that there is not much point to read
the book. (Don’t get me started on today’s
movie trailers!!! Ugh!!! I try to avoid them at all costs!) I tend to want a short review with a pretty
simple reason of why the book appeals or why it doesn’t. Again, all of the reviews are subjective so I
try to find sites where I can find reviewers whose taste in books line up with
my own. I do use Goodreads, Facebook
friends, talking to co-workers, Amazon, and my new favorite source, NoveList!

Hi Shannon! We came to the same conclusion with the romance title "Billionaire for Christmas" or whatever it was. I think my patrons would eat that up like skittles, and more power to them. It's definitely not something I'd read, but I don't judge. I have the same problem with patrons being embarrassed by their selections. It's unfortunate that your director won't buy paperback romances. Our primary directive is to "give them what they want".
ReplyDeleteHi,
ReplyDeleteI may not have viewed one of the reviews as reliable, but you make a good point. If your community of readers loves romance novels, then the library should have them available. If a the demand is there and the item comes in only one format, then buy it! I'm curious about ebook pricing and where that fits in with collectors' decisions.
I'm sad your director won't get paperback romances! They're not even expensive! I hope you get lots of good donations!Patrons are soo often embarrassed about steamier books so I try to make a few displays per year so that they are visible and people don't have to work up the nerve to ask. You bring up a lot of excellent thoughts and points in this response, full points!
ReplyDelete